California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Reed, 232 Cal.Rptr.3d 81, 4 Cal.5th 989, 416 P.3d 68 (Cal. 2018):
People v. Prieto (2003) 30 Cal.4th 226, 263, 133 Cal.Rptr.2d 18, 66 P.3d 1123.) Accordingly, a jury may impose a death sentence notwithstanding its belief that mitigating circumstances, including lingering doubt, exist. (See CALJIC No. 8.88 ["To return a judgment of death, each of you must be persuaded that the aggravating circumstances are so substantial in comparison with the mitigating circumstances that it warrants death instead of life without parole."].) The trial court's statement that, even if the jury has some doubt, it "still may choose which of the two penalties is appropriate" was therefore an accurate statement of the significance of the existence
[232 Cal.Rptr.3d 105]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.