Can a jury be impeached based on evidence of the juror's mental processes or subjective considerations?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Smith, No. B200900 (Cal. App. 6/18/2008), No. B200900. (Cal. App. 2008):

It is settled that a verdict may not be impeached based on evidence of a juror's mental processes or subjective considerations that influenced his or her vote. (Evid. Code, 1150, subd. (a); People v. Steele (2002) 27 Cal.4th 1230, 1260-1261.)

Other Questions


Can a finding of inability to perform the duties of a juror be based on the juror taking a position contrary to that of the other juror? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any grounds to argue that a section 24 instruction in a mental health case was read as precluding evidence of mental retardation to support evidence of incompetency? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury's verdict be impeached by inquiry into the jurors' mental processes? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction where the evidence is based primarily on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is there a reasonable probability that the defense would have disclosed impeached impeached or impeached evidence to the defense? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence of mental disease, mental defect or mental disorder admissible in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a motion for a new trial based on juror misconduct based on Juror misconduct, what is the effect of the finding on the credibility of the jury? (California, United States of America)
Does section 1123 of the Penal Code allow for a mistrial where a juror's illness or other good cause causes the juror to be unable to perform his duty and there are no alternate jurors? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for impeaching a judgment or verdict based upon evidence that merely discloses unusual circumstances? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054.3(b) of the Mental Health Act restrict the prosecution's access to materials derived from mental health examinations conducted under section 1054 of the Act, which were obtained from a mental health clinic? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.