Can a juror who instruct a defendant not to testify be found guilty of misconduct?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Strand, A128629 (Cal. App. 2011):

"The Fifth Amendment to the federal Constitution provides that no person 'shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.' . . . The right not to testify would be vitiated if the jury could draw adverse inferences from a defendant's failure to testify. Thus, the Fifth Amendment entitles a criminal defendant, upon request, to an instruction that will 'minimize the danger that the jury will give evidentiary weight to a defendant's failure to testify.' " (People v. Leonard (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1370, 1424-1425.) A juror's violation of an instruction not to consider the defendant's failure to testify constitutes misconduct. (Id. at p. 1425.)

Other Questions


Can a juror be found guilty of misconduct for violating instructions not to share information about the case on social media? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been found not guilty of a charge but found guilty of assault? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to meet with a juror to determine whether a defendant has made a sufficient showing of misconduct on a request to disclose juror information? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of Section 969a of the California Criminal Code when a jury has found a defendant not guilty of a charge of assault but found him guilty of the same charge? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct if a defendant's refusal to testify was interpreted as a deceptive tactic or reprehensible method to obtain a conviction? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a juror committed misconduct by failing to follow a trial's instruction not to discuss a defendant's failure to testify? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury find prejudice from a failure to give an aiding and abetting instruction when a defendant has been found guilty under instructions based on direct perpetrator liability? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's failure to testify at the penalty phase an error not to instruct the jury to refrain from drawing any inference from the fact that defendant did not testify at penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
Is there any evidence that the instruction that a defendant was either guilty of murder in the first degree or innocent in the second degree or guilty of manslaughter was incorrect? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.