Can a judge be found to have acted in an "arbitrary, capricious or patently absurd manner" in a criminal case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Medina, D057176, Super. Ct. No. RIF121073 (Cal. App. 2011):

arbitrary, capricious, or patently absurd manner that resulted in a manifest miscarriage of justice.(People v. Geier (2007) 41 Cal.4th 555, 585.) We discern no abuse of discretion in this case.

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a judge acted in an "arbitrary, capricious or patently absurd manner"? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for an appeal against a finding that a judge acted in an arbitrary, capricious or patently absurd manner that resulted in a miscarriage of justice? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for an appeal against a finding that the trial court acted in an arbitrary, capricious or patently absurd manner? (California, United States of America)
Can a criminal defendant be punished more than once for the same criminal act or for a series of criminal acts? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
Can a criminal defendant suffer multiple convictions for a single criminal act or series of related criminal acts? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
Can a self-represented defendant be found guilty of a criminal act against a criminal defendant under section 352 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
In a medical malpractice case, can a jury be found to have found that a jury member acted in a manner that may have improperly influenced the jury's verdict? (California, United States of America)
What is the objective test in determining whether a criminal act was a natural and probable consequence of another criminal act? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.