Can a husband and wife be convicted of criminal conspiracy?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from State v. Russo, 94 Cal.Rptr.2d 561 (Cal. App. 2000):

"There can be no question but that there must be a degree of dependent criminality between coconspirators to violate a criminal statute in order for a conviction to stand. In other words, the guilt of both must concur in order to establish the guilt of either. In the early case of People v. Richards [(1885)] 67 Cal. 412, 413 ..., the court held that: 'No one can dispute, or ever has disputed, that the offense cannot be committed by one alone....' [Citations.]" (People v. James, supra, 189 Cal.App.2d at p. 15.)

In People v. Reeves, supra, eight people were charged with criminal conspiracy. Of the eight people, two were a married couple at the time the law provided that a husband and wife were considered a single entity which could not conspire with itself. Husband and wife were both convicted, but all other individuals were acquitted or dismissed pursuant to section 995. (250 Cal.App.2d at pp. 491-495.) The couple's convictions for conspiracy were overturned.

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a witness has a criminal conviction for a previous criminal conviction that was impeaching the same criminal offence? (California, United States of America)
Can a reduction of a criminal conviction to a criminal charge change the nature of the criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
Does a convicted felon who has completed his sentence for a conviction for a felonies conviction under Proposition 47 of the California Criminal Code, who would have been convicted of a misdemeanor under this act if this act had not been in effect? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reversal of a conviction under section 186.22 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant has been convicted of a charge of criminal activity committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to provide a record of criminal convictions and a history of criminal activity with respect to criminal convictions? (California, United States of America)
When a convicted criminal has completed his sentence for a conviction for a crime committed under section 1170.18, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, can the conviction be reduced to a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
Can a judge strike a criminal conviction for a prior felony conviction under section 1385(a) of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for an increase in the maximum sentence for a criminal conviction where the crime was committed prior to the criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
Does a new criminal conviction for a charge of possession of a drug with intent to commit a criminal offence violate subdivision (e) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.