The following excerpt is from Bell v. Rackley, No. 2:16-cv-1436-JAM-EFB P (E.D. Cal. 2017):
Respondent argues that the petition must be dismissed because it raises no cognizable basis for federal habeas relief. Such relief may be had where an inmate is in custody in violation of the federal Constitution, laws, or treaties. 28 U.S.C. 2254(a). "[I]t is not the province of a federal habeas court to reexamine state-court determinations on state-law questions." Estelle v. Mcguire, 502 U.S. 62, 67-68 (1991). Absent a showing of a constitutional violation, a state court's application of state sentencing laws - including schemes that enhance sentences based on
Page 3
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.