California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Bankers Ins. Co., A156791 (Cal. App. 2020):
The cases cited by respondent are inapposite. First, they involved only acts by a court that were deemed in excess of jurisdiction, and they did not suggest that the failure to forfeit a bond could be characterized as such an act. To the contrary, one of the cases on which respondent relies - Bankers Insurance - distinguishes the situation where, as here, the court " 'no longer had jurisdiction to declare a forfeiture' " because the court had failed to follow the requirements of section 1305, and summary judgment on the bond was
Page 10
"void." (People v. Bankers Insurance (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 1377, 1385-1386 fn.10.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.