California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Bowen, E062263 (Cal. App. 2015):
The People first contend that defendant waived the argument the jury was erroneously instructed because his counsel essentially conceded that it was a controlled substance. However, "it is well settled that no objection is required to preserve a claim for appellate review that the jury instructions omitted an essential element of the charge." (People v. Mil (2102) 53 Cal.4th 400, 409.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.