Can a defendant change his statement to a law enforcement officer at the scene of the collision?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Cristobal, C072061 (Cal. App. 2015):

Defendant now contends (1) his statements to a law enforcement officer at the scene of the collision are inadmissible because they are the product of a custodial interrogation, and the officer did not give him the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694] (Miranda); (2) the trial court abused its discretion in excluding third party culpability evidence; and (3) the judgment must be reversed because of prejudicial juror misconduct.

Other Questions


In a civil case, can a law enforcement officer refer to the scene of the shooting as a crime scene? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who shot an off-duty police officer in the head with a single shot, get out of his car, get into his car and shoot the officer as the officer is approaching? (California, United States of America)
Can a Defendant challenge a finding that the victim's statements to police officers were admissible as prior inconsistent statements? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant exclude evidence of a prior DUI and a statement he made to a police officer at the scene of the accident? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who claims self-defense to a charge of battery upon a police officer, who is also charged with battery upon the officer, obtain materials from the police department concerning the propensity for violence against the officer? (California, United States of America)
What evidence does defendant need to support his claim that he aimed at the officer before he shot and killed the officer? (California, United States of America)
Can a criminal defendant compel the discovery of evidence in a law enforcement officer's personnel file? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant use the introduction of his out-of-court statements as an opportunity to introduce "extraneous statements" that might favor him? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant's extrajudicial statements form part of the prosecution's evidence, does the trial court have to instruct sua sponte that a finding of guilt cannot be predicated on the statements alone? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a constitutional right to view the scene of the crime scene during the penalty phase of his murder trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.