California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Cristobal, C072061 (Cal. App. 2015):
Defendant now contends (1) his statements to a law enforcement officer at the scene of the collision are inadmissible because they are the product of a custodial interrogation, and the officer did not give him the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694] (Miranda); (2) the trial court abused its discretion in excluding third party culpability evidence; and (3) the judgment must be reversed because of prejudicial juror misconduct.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.