California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Pla, B222765 (Cal. App. 2011):
An essential element of a violation of section 69 is that the officer must be engaged in the performance of his or her duties. (People v. White (1980) 101 Cal.App.3d 161, 167.) Resisting a lawful search can be a violation of section 69. (See People v. Gutierrez (2002) 28 Cal.4th 1083, 1154.) If the officer uses excessive force in the performance of what otherwise would be the performance of a lawful duty, a defendant cannot be convicted of resisting. (White, supra, at p. 167.) When excessive force by an officer is used as the excuse for the defendant's resistance, the trial court has a sua sponte duty to explain the limitation of the defendant's duty not to resist. (Id. at p. 164.) This limitation is explained in CALCRIM No. 2670.6 In White, the appellate court reversed a conviction for misdemeanor resisting because the trial court failed to so instruct.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.