Can a defendant be charged with kidnapping, robbery and assault charges under section 739 of the California Penal Code?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Superior Court of Sonoma Cnty., A143887 (Cal. App. 2015):

Penal Code section 739, allows the People to file an information against a defendant, charging him either with the offense(s) contained in the order of commitment or "any offense or offenses shown by the evidence taken before the magistrate to have been committed." (Pen. Code 739, italics added.) Furthermore, Penal Code section 1009 states, in pertinent part, "[A]n indictment, accusation or information may be amended by the district attorney, without leave of court at any time before the defendant pleads or a demurrer to the original pleading is sustained." In People v. Manning, supra, 133 Cal.App.3d 159, our colleagues in the Fifth District delineated the scope of

Page 5

amendments authorized pursuant to Penal Code section 739. The Manning court held that "unless the magistrate makes factual findings to the contrary, the prosecutor may amend the information after the preliminary hearing to charge any offense shown by the evidence adduced at the preliminary hearing provided the new crime is transactionally related to the crimes for which the defendant has previously been held to answer." (Manning, supra, 133 Cal.App.3d at p. 165.) It further held that because the defendant and defense counsel were present at the preliminary hearing, they had "notice of the potential charges he might have to face." (Id. at p. 167.) Adequate notice is provided by the nature of the evidence itself, rather than the crimes originally charged. (See People v. Donnell (1976) 65 Cal.App.3d 227, 233 ["it is not the complaint but the totality of the evidence produced at the preliminary hearing which notifies the defendant of the potential charges he may have to face in the superior court"].)

The kidnapping counts alleged here are clearly transactionally related to the alleged robbery/burglary counts because they arose out of the same event. (See People v. Bartlett (1967) 256 Cal.App.2d 787, 790-791.) No party disputes that.

Other Questions


Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who has been given a life sentence for an assault with intent to murder be convicted of the crime under section 12022(a) of the Penal Code section 120 22(b) and section 5.5 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does a Defendant who commits an assault with a firearm under section 245, subdivision (a)(1) of the California Criminal Code commit assault with the deadly weapon under Section 245 of the Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant is convicted of a burglary and assault charge under section 654 of the California Criminal Code, is the assault charge stayed? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Penal Code allow for an act or omission that is punishable by different sections of the Penal Code to be punished by one or more sections? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be punished for either kidnapping for robbery or kidnapping for kidnapping under section 654 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of a lesser included crime of the same crime under both sections of the California Penal Code and Section 654 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 1192.5 of the California Penal Code on a plea where a defendant has pleaded guilty to a charge of assault? (California, United States of America)
Is a convicted member of a street gang who is serving time for a charge of possession of a firearm with intent to endanger life or cause grievous bodily harm under section 186.22 of the California Penal Code (b)(1)(1) of the Penal Code)? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.