Can a defendant argue on appeal that the instruction on perfect self-defense should have been clarified?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Wright, H044844 (Cal. App. 2019):
6. To the extent that defendant contends that the instruction on perfect self-defense should have been clarified, his claim has been waived. "A party may not argue on appeal that an instruction correct in law was too general or incomplete, and thus needed clarification, without first requesting such clarification at trial." (People v. Hillhouse (2002) 27 Cal.4th 469, 503.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a defendant entitled to the benefit of the Court of Appeal's Appeal of Appeal when they are not yet convicted? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's assertion that a denial of a motion on appeal by defendants on appeal violate their right to appeal against the denial of their motion violate their due process? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have grounds to argue that a trial court prejudicially errs in failing to instruct the jury sua sponte at the penalty phase to disregard the no-sympathy instruction at the guilt phase? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant's failure to request clarification or amplification of an otherwise correct instruction on an instruction or in particular on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's failure to object to or request that an instruction be omitted or omitted from a jury's instructions forfeits his claim on appeal? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings of the California Superior Court of Appeal on the grounds that the instructions given by defendant in his conspiracy to commit felony murder were not tantamount to felony murder instructions? (California, United States of America)
Does a party have to complain to the Court on appeal that an instruction in a criminal case instructing a jury to convict a defendant of possessing all six firearms was "too general or incomplete"? (California, United States of America)
Can a party argue on appeal that the court failed to give a specific instruction when that party did not request such instruction? (California, United States of America)
How have the Attorney General argued that the Court of Appeal invited error in giving instructions on application of the reasonable doubt principle to a lesser included homicide defendant? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who requests instruction on a lesser-related charge of assault that includes the elements of implied malice murder be able to complain about the second degree murder instruction on appeal? (California, United States of America)
