Can a defendant appeal from the denial of Romero relief under section 1385 and seek remand on the ground that the trial court failed to properly exercise its discretion?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Knotts, G052148 (Cal. App. 2017):

Although a defendant may appeal from the denial of Romero relief under section 1385 and seek remand on the ground that the trial court failed to properly exercise its discretion, the "error must affirmatively appear on the record." (People v. Gillispie (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 429, 434.) Where, as here, the record is "'silent,'" it is not "appropriate to rely upon the rule that a trial court ordinarily is presumed to have correctly applied the law [citations]." (People v. Fuhrman (1997) 16 Cal.4th 930, 945 (Fuhrman).) Nevertheless, absent "any affirmative indication in the record that the trial court committed error or would have exercised discretion under section 1385 to strike the prior conviction if it believed it had such discretion, relief on appeal is not appropriate in this context." (Ibid.)

Other Questions


Can a defendant bring a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeal claiming that he failed to raise his constitutional claims in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the record of why defendant's trial counsel failed to object to the sentencing on the ground that the trial court improperly used defendant's religious beliefs as a basis for his sentence? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be remanded back to trial by the Court of Appeal for failing to provide a proper notice and hearing for attorney fees? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who failed to object to the trial court's decision to conduct voir dire in open court preserve the issue for appeal? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges on appeal a motion for a new trial on grounds of juror misconduct, does he accept the credibility determinations and findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does section 987.8(b) of the California Criminal Code require a motion by the Court of Appeal to remand a case back to the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's assertion that a denial of a motion on appeal by defendants on appeal violate their right to appeal against the denial of their motion violate their due process? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have any grounds to argue that the trial court erred in failing to give the cautionary instruction at the end of trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.