Can a criminal defendant who represents himself at trial be denied a right to consult the court on behalf of their own counsel?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Jones-Bey, B253050 (Cal. App. 2014):

Criminal defendants who represent themselves at trial have no constitutional right to advisory counsel. In fact, this is one of the warnings that must be given a defendant considering self-representation. (See People v. Weber (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 1041, 1057-1058 [defendants seeking to represent themselves should be warned, among other things, that they have no right to advisory counsel]; People v. Phillips (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 422, 428 [same].)

Although defendants have no right to advisory counsel, trial courts have authority to appoint advisory counsel to a self-represented criminal defendant. (People v. Bigelow (1984) 37 Cal.3d 731, 742.) In Bigelow, the court found it was an abuse of discretion to deny advisory counsel given the defendant's limited education, foreign nationality, unfamiliarity with California law, and the complexities of defending a capital case. (Id. at pp. 743-744.)

Other Questions


When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who is represented by counsel during the first part of a criminal trial invoke his right to self-representation mid-trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant deprived of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel when a trial court denies his motion to substitute one appointed counsel for another? (California, United States of America)
Is appellant's claim that he was denied a right to exercise his right to a fair trial by a judge in the Superior Court of Appeal that he had been denied a fair hearing? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that he was denied his constitutional right to due process of law because the trial court relieved the prosecution of its burden of establishing that defendant acted with malice? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court erred by failing to give a defendant separate advisement of his right to counsel and obtaining a waiver of that right? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a self-represented defendant be found guilty of a criminal act against a criminal defendant under section 352 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a criminal defendant waive his right to counsel and represent himself at trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.