California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Krol v. Sampson, 278 Cal.Rptr. 164, 6 Cal.App.4th 310 (Cal. App. 1991):
Turning to the facts of the present case, I agree with the majority that, under traditional analysis, reasonable implied assumption of the risk bars appellant's action as a matter of law. The second baseman's throw was within the ordinary expectations of the participants and thus "no cause of action can succeed based on a resulting injury." (Ordway v. Superior Court, supra, 198 Cal.App.3d. at pp. 111-112, 243 Cal.Rptr. 536, fn. omitted.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.