In what circumstances can a cablegram be used to convey instructions to a proxy?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Beatty v. First Explor. Fund 1987 & Co., 1988 CanLII 3066 (BC SC):
In Sadgrove v. Bryden, [1907] 1 Ch. 318, the court approved of the use of a cablegram to convey instructions concerning the manner in which the holder of a proxy was to vote.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will a company refuse to follow instructions of two joint shareholders as to how to register their interests? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the Province avoid liability in whole or part because of factual circumstances in the background of causation where those circumstances are of a non-tortious nature? (British Columbia, Canada)
Under what circumstances have defence counsel sought to water down the CIVJI instruction with respect to vomit? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Justice order a further review order to order that an expert in economic forecasting of the economic circumstances of a separated spouse be reviewed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a change of circumstance in circumstances arising from an application to cancel or reduce arrears constitute a separate code of conduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a jury be asked to give an immediate and final instruction to the jury concerning the issues of concern? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there a duty upon a stockbroker to ensure that the instructions are crystal clear before acting on the instructions? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Law Society of BC accept a conditional admission of professional misconduct in circumstances where a lawyer commenced an intimate personal relationship with a man? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether performance in the present circumstances would render the contract radically different from that which was agreed in the circumstances of August 25? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the change in circumstances of the mother's circumstances constitute a distinct departure from what the parties could reasonably have anticipated in August 1999? (British Columbia, Canada)
