Is this a case for double costs?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Brydon v. Thom, 2015 BCSC 479 (CanLII):

It is my view as in Burnett v. Moir, 2012 BCSC 1286 (paras. 48 - 50), that this is not a case for double costs. The result was not preordained and it cannot be said that the offer should have been accepted. As noted in Meghji v. Lee, 2012 BCSC 379, this cannot be determined in hindsight by the court’s decision in the case.

Other Questions


Is security for costs of an appeal cost more readily than security for trial costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an offeror be awarded costs or double costs from the date of the offer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to special costs for making the submissions of double costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of having to pay double costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
When an offer made by a defendant for pre-trial settlement is reasonably refused, is the fact that the action is ultimately dismissed in its entirety a factor in determining double costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a plaintiff has not used an item of service in the past, is it appropriate to include that cost in the future cost award? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court award double costs if a settlement offer does not contain the required wording? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the husband be ordered to pay costs to the wife for his failure to comply with the rules of court and order the wife to pay solicitor and client costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the considerations that determine whether double costs are appropriate? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an award of double costs for failing to accept an offer to settle that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.