How have courts considered an argument based on accruing interest constituting prejudice?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from NGC Management Ltd. v Lengara Ventures Inc., 2017 BCSC 1286 (CanLII):
In British Columbia v. Therrien, [1999] B.C.J. No. 1038 (S.C.), the court considered an argument based on accruing interest constituting prejudice and held:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts in BC considered a claim for spousal support based on income disparity? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is the loss of a trial date, prolonging litigation, and associated difficulties and hardships that may be suffered by one or more of the parties suffer not factors that constitute “prejudice” in considering whether to grant the amendments? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the Court consider in deciding whether it would be unjust to find that a summary trial is appropriate to consider the issues before deciding whether to proceed with a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a court to consider good faith and the best interests of the child in the context of s. 46(2)(a) of the Family Law Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
When considering a long-term mental health case, is it possible for the court to consider a single clinical record? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the court consider when considering retroactive variation of an interim child support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
When an accused experiences 14 to 18 months of institutional delay, can the court infer prejudice in the absence of actual prejudice? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the court in BC considered third party privacy interests in deciding whether to grant disclosure to a plaintiff's personal computer drive? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal in the Supreme Court consider 4 costs considerations? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of B.C holding that the Court has jurisdiction to determine whether a person who is not a party to a particular type of tortfeasor has a valid claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
