How has the adjudicator considered the breath test tickets?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Quigley v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) et al., 2004 BCSC 200 (CanLII):
Further to that submission, petitioner’s counsel argued, relying on Jan Matous v. Superintendent of Motor Vehicles 2003 BCSC 1531, that the Breath Test Tickets should be excluded from consideration by the adjudicator and a re-hearing of the review be ordered with a direction that the adjudicator not consider the tickets.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will a adjudicator's reasoning be manifestly flawed where the adjudicator failed to consider the evidence supporting the findings of two witnesses? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the court consider when considering retroactive variation of an interim child support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the Court consider in deciding whether it would be unjust to find that a summary trial is appropriate to consider the issues before deciding whether to proceed with a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
When considering a long-term mental health case, is it possible for the court to consider a single clinical record? (British Columbia, Canada)
When considering a patient's medical history, is it possible for the medical malpractice review to consider a single file? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is the adjudicator of a motor vehicle adjudicator a judge in a non-criminal context? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for deference given to an adjudicator in a case where the adjudicator has been found in error? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of the respondent’s position that the adjudicator must consider all the relevant evidence before making a credibility finding? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard for a medical trust committee to consider a patient’s wishes when considering a transfer of funds? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it reasonable for an adjudicator to refuse to consider the validity of a demand under the Access to Benefits Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
