The absence of either a subjective or objective basis for such a suspicion will render the demand invalid. The seizure of a breath sample would be a violation of the subject’s right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. R v. Grant (1991), 1991 CanLII 38 (SCC), 67 C.C.C. (3d) 268 (SCC)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.