Does a subdivision agreement between a plaintiff and a party need to be changed to reflect the nature of their relationship?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Adefarakan v. Toronto (City), 2000 CanLII 22819 (ON SC):

33 It is the position of the plaintiff respondents that the nature of their contractual relationship is a little like turning the subdivision agreement considered in Brandon v. Brandon inside out as the contractual agreement for which the respondents gave their consideration was ultimately incorporated into a by-law.

Other Questions


What is the test for establishing that the intention of the parties is determinative of the nature of the relationship between the parties? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the nature of the relationship between the parties in determining whether a fiduciary duty exists? (Ontario, Canada)
Is the continued conflict between the parties a material change in circumstances for a change in a restraining order? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a third-party funding agreement required to indemnify the representative plaintiff against an adverse costs award? (Ontario, Canada)
If a successful party accepts an offer to settle, can the successful party be ordered to pay all or part of the unsuccessful party’s costs? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a party deliberately misrepresented another party to an agreement? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of the parties’ agreement on the division of net family property pursuant to the terms of the agreement? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the requirement of uberrima fides apply when the parties have entered into a separation agreement requiring the parties to pay support for the children of the marriage? (Ontario, Canada)
Is an entire agreement clause binding a party to whom the agreement was signed? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for establishing a commercial relationship between a party and party? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.