What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff’s injuries are indivisible or a constituent cause?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Dholliwar v. Yu, 2015 BCSC 670 (CanLII):
The defendants take the position that the plaintiff’s injuries are indivisible, i.e. they cannot be separated or have liability attributed to the constituent cause: Bradley v. Groves, 2010 BCCA 361.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a defendant is liable for causing a plaintiff’s injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff’s injuries are divisible or indivisible? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff's injuries are divisible or indivisible? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's negligence caused injuries to a plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a compensable injury must be the sole cause of a disability before compensation is payable? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff can claim damages for personal injuries from a pre-existing condition? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether an injury is divisible or indivisible? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff should have to pay additional special costs in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's negligence contributed to a plaintiff's injuries? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether the Accident caused the disputed injuries? (British Columbia, Canada)
