What is the test for admissible evidence in the context of a motion for summary judgment?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Cowichan Tribes v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 BCSC 1646 (CanLII):
I find Bower v. Cominco Ltd., [1998] B.C.J. No. 977, most helpful in this application because it addresses this issue of whether the evidence of a person named as a representative is admissible against all other members of the represented class.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When there are two defendants in a motion for summary judgment against each other, does the court have any authority to grant summary judgment? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Minister of Justice considered the issue of standing in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a summary trial on a motion of summary judgment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to dismiss a motion for summary judgment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a no evidence motion and an insufficient evidence motion? (British Columbia, Canada)
What summary of evidence is admissible as evidence in an extradition hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the elements of procedural fairness in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the cost of a summary trial for a motion of summary judgment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff required to lead expert evidence to overcome a no evidence motion? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a no evidence motion where a real estate agent defendant argued that there was no expert evidence sufficient to establish a standard of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
