In Boe v. Hamilton, the plaintiff allegedly assaulted a union official at a meeting. The plaintiff was removed from office as a business agent and barred from holding office or attending meetings. Bouck J. declared the union’s action illegal because there was nothing in the constitution that specifically made the conduct complained of an offence. He also found that the procedure was defective because the laying of charges was approved by a majority vote of members at a meeting, when the constitution required a majority vote of all members of the local.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.