Does the issue of double dipping from the remaining portion of the equalized pension remain?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Armstrong. v Armstrong, 2016 ONSC 126 (CanLII):

The issue of double dipping from the remaining portion of the equalized pension remains. If capital assets have already been divided pursuant to the provincial matrimonial property regime, the principle of “double dipping” or “double recovery” may preclude an order for spousal support or reduce the amount that would otherwise have been ordered: Boston v. Boston.

Other Questions


What is the effect of postponing equalization of a husband's pension equalization until after the husband’s pension is equalized? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a double-dipping scheme where the husband's post-separation pension has not been equalized? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to pay spousal support on the unequalized portion of his pension for the purposes of his equalized portion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the position of the wife in a marriage breakdown case where the husband's pension is divided and the wife is entitled to double recovery or double dip? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the court in Shepley considered "double dipping" in equalization payments? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for using the term issue "issue" in the context of the issue? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the implications of common issues that remain after common issues have been resolved? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts treated the wife’s expenses in the context of the unequalized portion of the pension issue? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the case law regarding mobility issues and custody and mobility issues? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a plaintiff recover the entire loss from a company pension plan if the company pension is not indemnified as a result of the accident? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.