In what circumstances have common law principles concerning duress and undue influence been reviewed in common law?

Manitoba, Canada


The following excerpt is from Langdon v. Langdon, 2015 MBQB 153 (CanLII):

In the recent case of Toscano v. Toscano, 2015 ONSC 487; 57 R.F.L. (7th) 234, Blishen J. had occasion to review common law principles concerning duress, undue influence and the effect of the absence of independent legal advice. Blishen J. said:

Other Questions


In what circumstances would the wife be able to prove that she was not under duress or undue influence to enter into a marriage agreement? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for undue influence, misinformation and duress? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts considered the role of suspicious circumstances in the issue of testamentary capacity and undue influence? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the trial judge err in principle in the analysis of the issues of undue influence and testamentary capacity? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a testatrix be found to have undue influence over the making of a will? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court consider undue influence? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances have undue influence been defined by the Court? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the principles of undue influence in real estate law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for undue influence, misinformation and duress? (British Columbia, Canada)