In Birdi v. Birdi, 2015 ONSC 1974, 58 R.F.L. (7th) 274, Emery J. reviewed what at first glance appeared to be two different approaches historically taken by the court on motions for questioning. He referred first to the “traditional approach”, in which the value of questioning was recognized: paras. 18-20. He contrasted that approach with the “more restrained approach” to questioning, whereby “good reason” must be shown before questioning is ordered: paras. 21-25.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.