Bird v. Philpott is cited from time to time for the proposition that a bankrupt is entitled, as cestui que trust, to any surplus, and the trustee in bankruptcy is accountable to him. Counsel have cited no authority, and I am aware of none, which relies upon Bird v. Philpott for the proposition that the bankrupt may dispose of a surplus before the creditors have been paid in full and the amount of the surplus has been ascertained. Insofar as Bird v. Philpott suggests that this is possible, I would respectfully decline to follow it.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.