What is the test for establishing cause in a motor vehicle accident?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Kirkham v. Richardson, 2014 BCSC 1068 (CanLII):

The plaintiff need not establish that the defendant’s negligence was the sole cause of the injury. If other potential causes exist, such as the bike crash in this case, the plaintiff will still establish cause in fact if she can prove a substantial connection between the injury and the defendant’s conduct, beyond the de minimus range: Farrant v. Laktin, 2011 BCCA 336, at para. 11.

Other Questions


What is the test for establishing cause of cause of injury in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing a cause of cause of injury in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident involving a stolen vehicle, can the driver of the stolen vehicle be held liable for damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing cause or contributory factors in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing cause of shoulder injury in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a motor vehicle accident and a subsequent motor vehicle collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that depression and business losses were caused or contributed to by a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing causation between a motor vehicle accident and a subsequent accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a motor vehicle accident is an accident or an accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing a cause of negligence in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.