Is it necessary for the trial judge to determine whether this residence was unfit for habitation?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Jacob v. Pool, 2011 ABPC 321 (CanLII):

Is it necessary for the trial judge to determine whether this residence was unfit for habitation? The case of Biegler v. Stacey (1995) 172 A.R. 57 stands for the proposition that in order for a purchase of a residential property to have a cause of action against a vendor for fraudulent concealment, the concealed defect had to affect the fitness of the home for habitation purposes.

Other Questions


What is the standard of review for the purpose of determining whether a trial judge made a palpable and overriding error? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the relevant considerations to a judge when deciding whether or not to order trial by jury in a personal injury case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant has a right to a speedy trial when there has been a long delay? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the trial judge determined the individual share of family expenses in a personal injury case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the legal test for a surgeon to determine whether a patient’s hypothetical choice to refuse treatment should be based solely on the testimony of the patient at trial? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a judge to determine whether or not to divide a husband and wife's assets equally? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a judge to determine whether a parent has a right to restrict access? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a jury to determine whether a trial can be conveniently conducted by a jury? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the difference between a chambers judge and a trial judge? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a motions judge to determine if a plaintiff is entitled to a trial? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.