What is the test for "ordinarily used" for family purposes?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Hadjioannou v. Hadjioannou, 2013 BCSC 43 (CanLII):
It is essentially a question of fact in each case whether an asset may be said to have been "ordinarily used" for family purposes: Bennett v. Bennett, 2003 BCCA 707 at para. 10.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for establishing that a family bank account is not used ordinarily for a family purpose? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does use of an asset for a family purpose prior to marriage make it a family asset? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the use of income from a capital asset for family purposes constitute a family asset? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have funds derived from a trust in 1998 been ordinarily used for a family purpose? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the use of the income generated by the rental property for the purposes of determining whether the property is a family asset? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the BCCA's policy of setting a guideline salary for the purpose of determining the appropriate amount for the purposes of guideline purposes? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a savings fund be used for a family purpose? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a vehicle that is insured for farm use and pleasure use more than twice as much as the vehicle insured for the purpose of transporting the insured to and from work? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a party seeking to change the date on which to value family property or family debt under the Family Law Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a loan advanced from the parents of a married person to be used for a family purpose should be presumed to have been a gift? (British Columbia, Canada)
