How have the courts treated a bill for tithes?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Canada Life Assurance Co. v. MacDonald, 1926 CanLII 85 (SK QB):
Bell v. Read (1765) 3 Atk. 590 (26 E.R. 1140) wherein a bill was brought against the defendants for tithes. In this they pleaded that previously, namely, in the year 1743, a bill had been brought against them for the same matter and that the cause was heard in 1746 and an account decreed and that they had been directed to pay what should be found due.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the court require that a document be submitted so that its contents can be reviewed by the court to determine whether it is privileged? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts in England and Wales treated a promise to pay £100 in London? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts treated the headnote in cases where a plaintiff was killed by an incandescent lamp socket? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts and arbitrators treated sexual harassment in a medical malpractice case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court require that a document be submitted so that the contents of the document can be reviewed by the court to determine whether it is privileged? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts treated liability in cases involving slip and fall? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court review a decision by a majority of the Court of Appeal not adjourning on a motion of appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts treated letters offering to take a farm on a lease for 21 years? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have any jurisdiction to interfere in a finding of fact from the lower courts? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of section 4(1) of the Statement of Claimant's Affidavit to the Court of Appeal allowing the Court to consider any evidence which is not confined to facts which the deponent is able to prove? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
