Is there a bar to a plaintiff’s claim in the absence of a traumatic event?

Nova Scotia, Canada


The following excerpt is from McPhee v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, 2007 NSSC 94 (CanLII):

While the categories and circumstances of negligence generally are unlimited, I could not find any endorsement of Lambert, J.A.'s approach in Beecham v. Hughes. I am not prepared to expand the application of this tort beyond the limited circumstances in which it has been found to exist until now; therefore, I agree that the absence of a traumatic event is a bar to the plaintiffs’ claim.

Other Questions


Is a defendant liable to a plaintiff's claim that they could reasonably have avoided some part of the loss claimed? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
In what circumstances can a plaintiff claim damages for misrepresentation in a property condition disclosure statement? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a plaintiff be able to claim damages for the loss of money owing on his truck? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to the production of manuals, procedures, and guidelines that relate to the manner in which the insurer handles claims? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the vulnerability of a plaintiff in a claim for emotional distress? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is there any common issues between a plaintiff and plaintiff? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff required to provide expert evidence to support her claim for medical negligence? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What changes have been made to the circumstances in which a plaintiff's claim was denied? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for inordinate delay in determining whether there is serious prejudice to a plaintiff's claim? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a plaintiff be able to make a claim for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.