What is the test for addressing conflicting evidence in a review?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Davis v British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2019 BCSC 1005 (CanLII):
Failure to address conflicting evidence on a matter that is “central to the outcome of the review” can lead to a conclusion that the route to a decision is demonstrably or manifestly unreasonable: Petrov v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCCA 486 at para. 34.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Will the adjudicator's decision not to address conflicting evidence central to the outcome of a review be unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it appropriate to re-open a hearing to receive oral evidence in cases of conflicting evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted Bolster Review Review Review for mixed fact and law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the standards of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision made under the Rules of Review Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a no evidence motion where a real estate agent defendant argued that there was no expert evidence sufficient to establish a standard of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the judicial review approach used by a court engaged in judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for reviewing a decision-making power of a body in the context of constitutional review analysis? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a formal offer to settle be sent to an email address rather than the formal address for delivery? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for admitting fresh evidence in an appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the standard of review apply to a review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal decision to which the decision was patently unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
