Is BCALC acting within its jurisdiction in interpreting its policy on cannabis use?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Lorindale Holdings Ltd. v. B.C.A.L.C., 2001 BCSC 854 (CanLII):
BCALC submits that it acted within its jurisdiction in interpreting its policy, and that since it had broad authority to make the decision at issue, its decision must stand. BCALC relies on Maple Lodge Farms v. Government of Canada (1982), 1982 CanLII 24 (SCC), 2 S.C.R. 2.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can ICBC argue that s. 91 of the Insurance Code of Canada Act, s.91(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, or s.92 of the Act, be interpreted in the context of statutory interpretation? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the BC government's policy of not funding interpretation services for deaf patients been interpreted in conjunction with receipt of medical care? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does section 50 of the Solicitors Act, 1957, still have jurisdiction to control the remuneration of a solicitor? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for relying on ss. 160-162 of the Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c. 25 [Family Law Act)? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the rules of interpretation in the interpretation of tax legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a person acts within their legal rights, is that person liable even if another person suffers a loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a municipality's by-laws on the renewal of a policy of purchase and use of a vehicle insurance policy? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a domestic court have jurisdiction to consider fraud in the foreign jurisdiction? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the CRT have jurisdiction under its strata property jurisdiction to decide tort claims such as inducing breach of contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what cases have the courts restrained a lawyer from acting where the lawyer has previously acted jointly for another lawyer? (British Columbia, Canada)
