What is the limitation defence argument in a case of solicitor error or negligence?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Neis v. Yancey, 1999 ABCA 272 (CanLII):

Basarsky v. Quinlan was a case of solicitor error or negligence in failing to claim on behalf of the dependants or plead the Fatal Accidents Act. In that case, Hall J. found special circumstances because all the facts relating to the claim were pleaded, the examinations for discovery included questions relevant to a Fatal Accidents Act claim, and the defendants were not actually prejudiced. But as there had been no discontinuance filed in that case, and the proceedings were ongoing, the limitation defence argument was plainly wholly technical.

Other Questions


What are the principles applicable to an argument of estoppel in respect of limitation defence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the limitation defence in limitation cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
How may a defendant negate the inference of negligence by raising the defence of explanation or defence of inevitable accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances have the defence been successful against the defence in argument? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the filing of a notice of change of solicitor appointing a private defence counsel constitute an overhead of the solicitor? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the defence argument in defence of a plaintiff's claim for loss of income earning capacity due to injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for negligence in the conduct of a defence? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the limitation period for an alternative argument in a personal injury application? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is there any case law where a plaintiff’s solicitor failed to file a statement of claim until after the expiration of the limitation period? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the limitation period defence in a motion brought and adjudicated under Rule 21.01(1)(a)? (Ontario, Canada)