What is the limitation defence argument in a case of solicitor error or negligence?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Neis v. Yancey, 1999 ABCA 272 (CanLII):

Basarsky v. Quinlan was a case of solicitor error or negligence in failing to claim on behalf of the dependants or plead the Fatal Accidents Act. In that case, Hall J. found special circumstances because all the facts relating to the claim were pleaded, the examinations for discovery included questions relevant to a Fatal Accidents Act claim, and the defendants were not actually prejudiced. But as there had been no discontinuance filed in that case, and the proceedings were ongoing, the limitation defence argument was plainly wholly technical.

Other Questions


In what circumstances have the defence been successful against the defence in argument? (Alberta, Canada)
Is an expert opinion required to start the limitations period running in a medical negligence action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the effect of the death of a limited partner in a limited partnership? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the case law around short limitation periods for a claim under the statute of limitation? (Alberta, Canada)
Does solicitor-client privilege extend to conversations in which a person makes disclosures while seeking to retain a solicitor? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the effect of Rand J. in the Turta case on limitation limitation? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining the applicable limitation period under a statute of limitation? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the defence of self-defence in a murder case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for contributory negligence under the Contributory Negligence Act? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the argument that negligence or lack of care on the part of a visitor relieves the occupier of his duty to make the premises reasonably safe? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.