Is a trial judge’s award of costs reasonable?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Taseko Mines Limited v. Western Canada Wilderness Committee, 2017 BCCA 431 (CanLII):

A trial judge’s award of costs is entitled to considerable deference, and will only be interfered with if the judge failed to exercise that discretion judicially or exercised it on a wrong principle: Baiden v. Vancouver (City), 2010 BCCA 375 at para. 18.

Other Questions


Is a trial judge's failure to give reasons sufficient to determine that the trial judge erred in appreciation of a relevant issue or application of the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an appellate court "reconsider" evidence presented at trial when there is a reasoned belief that the trial judge must have forgotten or misconceived the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge award a special costs award for an unsuccessful claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a judge award special costs for a number of trial days, attributable to reprehensible conduct? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a summary trial judge make a finding that a matter is not suitable for disposition by way of summary trial during the hearing of the summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is security for costs of an appeal cost more readily than security for trial costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are sufficient reasons are required for a trial judge to leave a defendant with no reasonable doubt? (British Columbia, Canada)
In an appeal from an acquittal, can the reasonableness of the trial judge’s reasons be considered to be inadequate? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for awarding trial judges costs in litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a trial judge refuse to award double costs to a successful plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.