Is there any case law that pierce the corporate veil in employment cases?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Cardinal v. Willier, 2010 ABQB 238 (CanLII):

Bagby v. Gustavson is cited for the ability of the court to pierce the corporate veil in employment cases. At paras. 44, 47 and 48, Laycraft J.A. (as he then was) stated:

Other Questions


What is the case law on case-by-case privilege? (Alberta, Canada)
Is the doctrine of surrender limited to cases of landlord and tenant cases? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the range of general and pecuniary damages for discrimination against an employer in a human rights case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an employment tribunal case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the case law on interposition in cases where interposition was sought? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a shareholder of a corporation who is not a majority shareholder of the corporation obtain relief under the oppression provisions? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the case law in the United States when it comes to the case of a lay-man who is not qualified to stand trial? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law in which a defence counsel has been found to have made out deficiencies in the credibility assessment? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any common law common law concept or common law relation to corporate shields or corporate vale? (Alberta, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident case where the victim is not dead but still exists, is there any case law that supports the presumption that the accident victim’s death is not an accident? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.