Does the headnote in an affidavit need to include “A Commissioner, etc.” in the jurat?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Cameron-Hutt Limited v. MacMillen, 1933 CanLII 243 (SK QB):
Babcock v. Bedford Tp. (1859) 8 U.C.C.P. 527. The headnote in that case reads as follows: Held, that a signature in the jurat of an affidavit without the addition of “A commissioner, etc.” was insufficient.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the limits of what can be included in an affidavit in a family law proceeding? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does an affidavit need to include opinion or argument? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a defendant deposed in an affidavit that he did not feel the allegations were truthful or justified? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a "de novo" review of a decision of the Chief Commissioner of Human Rights? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a panel member review the decision of the Chief Commissioner to dismiss a complaint? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for making an affidavit of documents? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does Defendant have to amend his statement of defence to include an allegation that there were 200 acres broken on this land? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a defendant cross-examine the affiants of two affidavits from U.S. attorneys? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the phrase "appear in person" include the ordinary entry of appearance after service of a writ of summons? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the word “testamentary expense” include estate duty on personal property? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
