In support of ground (b) in a chattel mortgage application, how have the courts interpreted the doctrine of "spent transaction"?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Leoville Savings and Credit Union Limited v. Campagna, 1970 CanLII 613 (SK QB):

In support of ground (b) the appellant relied particularly on Cookson v. Swire (1884) 9 App Cas 653, 54 LJQB 249, and submitted that as the pigs had been seized and sold before the validity of the chattel mortgage was questioned the matter became a “spent transaction” and could not be resurrected in order that the bank might attack its validity in the interpleader proceedings.

Other Questions


Can an application to have an action brought in this court dismissed on the grounds that this court lacks jurisdiction to hear it? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the "automobile in motion" doctrine? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted a caveat in a real estate transaction? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a chattel mortgage need to be rescinded if the mortgagor is a tenant of a property where the mortgage was made prior to the tenant becoming a tenant? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can an application be made for an extension of time on an application to extend the time on which the application is granted? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted a plea of non est factum? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted a surrender statement in the context of a commercial lease? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What documents are properly to be considered on an application to strike out a statement of claim on the grounds that it discloses no reasonable cause of action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts dealt with a wife’s petition for judicial review on the grounds of cruelty arid adultery? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts dealt with an application for an order quashing a resolution approving payment of legal expenses? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.