What is the test for using the term “at large” in the context of damages for defamation?

Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada


The following excerpt is from Campbell v. Tremblay, 2010 NLCA 62 (CanLII):

Lord Hailsham of St. Marylebone in Broome v. Cassell suggested as follows at page 1073: “The expression ‘at large’ should be used in general to cover all cases where awards of damages may include elements for loss of reputation, injured feelings, bad or good conduct by either party, or punishment, and where in consequence no precise limit can be set.”

Other Questions


What is the test for using the term "at large" in the meaning of damages in a defamation case? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Is there any case law where a plaintiff has been awarded damages for personal injury damages in a motor vehicle accident? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Can an insurer recover damages from a cleaning service where a defective machine causes damage to a carpet in the home? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the test for special damages in defamation cases? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the effect of using hostile and intemperate language in the context of discrimination? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
Is a town entitled to claim damages from the property of the townspeople if the town equipment causes damage to the property? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
In what circumstances will a defendant be liable for damages if he causes damage to another person’s property? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the test for discrimination in the context of human rights? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the difference between general and aggravated damages in a personal injury case? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
What is the effect of bad behaviour on a plaintiff’s claim for damages? (Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.