Are doctors' and nurses' opinions admissible under Ares v. Venner?

Ontario, Canada

The following excerpt is from Re J.C. (An Infant), 1984 CanLII 2731 (ON CJ):

[14] I have yet to hear argument whether the doctors’ and nurses’ opinions are the kinds of opinions that are admissible under Ares v. Venner, because the society faces some preliminary problems.

[15] In order for hospital records to be qualified for admission into evidence under Ares v. Venner, the court must be satisfied: (a) that the entry or record was made contemporaneously with the events then being recorded; (b) that the maker of the record had personal knowledge of the matters being recorded; (c) that the maker was under a duty to make the entry or record; and (d) that the maker of the record has been identified and is available to be called as a witness.

Other Questions

Is expert opinion admissible under Ares v. Venner? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a hospital record qualified for admission into evidence under Ares v. Venner? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the case law on hearsay under the Venner doctrine? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of care of a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case where there are conflicting opinions between two doctors? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can expert opinions based on assumed facts be admissible at trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an affidavit that outlines allegations without personal knowledge or opinions be admissible? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for admissible statements made by a person under detention as a result of questions put to him by a police officer? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What evidence is admissible under s.29 of the Criminal Proceeds of Crime Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a prior complaint admissible under the narrative exception? (British Columbia, Canada)
Under what circumstances will the defence counsel be allowed to attach unsworn letters to an affidavit that express their opinions? (British Columbia, Canada)