Nothing in Ares v. Venner detracts from the usual rule that Rule 40A must be complied with if the statement sought to be admitted is found to be an expert opinion. Ares v. Venner permits in limited circumstances the introduction of certain types of opinions as proof of a fact. In my view it is only limited types of opinions, more in the nature of observations, which fall into the Ares v. Venner exception, and outside the ambit of Rule 40A.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.