How have courts interpreted arbitration clauses in sports contracts?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Cecrop Co. v. Kinetic Sciences inc., 2001 BCSC 532 (CanLII):

In Roy v. Boyce (1991), 57 B.C.L.R. (2d) 187 (S.C.), the arbitration clause was held to be valid despite the possible absence of a condition precedent to the continuing existence of the contract.

Other Questions


How have the courts interpreted contracts in the context of the interpretation of contracts? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a "deposit clause" in standard form contracts? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the contract and what are the consequences of the contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of a contract when a contract is not enforceable? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an arbitration clause be included in a contract where there is a dispute as to whether there has ever been a binding contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
In the context of the BCCA's submission to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, how have the submissions been interpreted? (British Columbia, Canada)
How can a court interpret a contract where a party's subsequent conduct is interpreted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for the construction of a contract where a clause in the contract states that a condition fundamental to the agreement must be met before the contract can be signed? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted exclusionary clauses in contracts? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.