What is the test for a motion to strike out an amendment to the Rules of Civil Procedure?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Hainey v. Hainey, 1999 CanLII 14992 (ON SC):

In Vaiman v. Yates (1987), 1987 CanLII 4345 (ON SC), 60 O.R. (2d) 696 (Ont. H.C.), decided after the amendments, Rosenberg J., at p. 698, asked: Why should the defendant be faced with an amendment and then have to move to strike it out on the grounds that it discloses no cause of action. If the master is of the opinion that it discloses no cause of action, he should not allow the amendment and state his reasons. The plaintiff then has the right to appeal. Molloy J. calls this a “logical rationale. I agree.

Other Questions


What is the test for substantial merit on a motion to strike a claim pursuant to Rule 21 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Ontario, Canada)
Can the court use the application procedure under rule 14.05(h) of the Rules of Civil Procedure to determine whether there will be any material facts in dispute? (Ontario, Canada)
Does Rule 20 of the Rules of Civil Procedure deal with a summary judgement motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a motion under Rule 19(1-4) of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Ontario, Canada)
What steps have been taken in a civil action under Rule 1(8) of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a motion to strike a portion of the pleadings under Rule 21 or 25 distinct from a motion for partial judgment under Rule 20? (Ontario, Canada)
How has Rule 6 of the Rules of Civil Procedure been interpreted? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for making an Order under Rule 33 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Ontario, Canada)
How has Rule 25.11 of the Rules of Civil Procedure been interpreted? (Ontario, Canada)
How does rule 16 of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to summary judgment? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.