The worker’s counsel has referred me to Bandic v. WCAT, 2013 BCSC 2063 (CanLII). In that case Mr. Justice Wong pointed out that a new decision about the reasons for a worker’s unemployment was required when a new permanent condition was accepted. The desirability of consistency with prior appellate decisions does not outweigh the requirement for a new decision especially when some of the most relevant factors have changed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.