In Minty v. Lucas, 2014 ONSC 3169 (Div. Ct.), an application for judicial review was made of an interlocutory ruling by a coroner relating to the scope of cross-examination that would be permitted of two police officers to be called as witnesses at the inquest. A companion motion was brought before the corner seeking a ruling that if the cross-examination requested was permitted, counsel representing the officers at the inquest should be disqualified for conflict of interest. In light of the ruling made by the corner as to the scope of cross-examination permitted, he did not rule on the motion to disqualify counsel as it appeared to be moot.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.