Since this is an appeal by the Crown from acquittal of an accused at trial, the onus is on the Crown not only to show that there was error in law but also that the verdict would not necessarily have been the same had the trial judge not erred in excluding the evidence of prior identification: Vezeau v. R. (1975), 1976 CanLII 7 (SCC), 34 C.R.N.S. 309, 28 C.C.C. (2d) 81 at 87, 66 D.L.R. (3d) 418, 8 N.R. 235 (S.C.C.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.