The plaintiff pointed out that the issue on which she did not succeed did not take up much time at trial. That is true, as the enforceability of the termination clause was a question of law addressed primarily in submissions. However, little turns on this because the defendant did not seek any apportionment of costs under Rule 14-1(15), nor would I have considered such an order to be appropriate here. Apportionment of costs is to be confined to relatively rare cases: see Loft v. Nat, 2015 BCCA 418 at para. 25.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.