Canada v. Aqua-Gem Investments Ltd., 1993 CanLII 2939 (FCA), [1993] 2 F.C. 425 stands for the proposition that, on an appeal from a prothonotary, where what is involved is a question vital to the final issue of a case, a judge ought to exercise his or her discretion de novo (see page 463). The parties agreed that a decision to dismiss or continue under Rule 382 is such a decision, and therefore a judge on appeal should exercise discretion de novo in these circumstances.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.